No it shouldn't. Maybe it should be 13 and older...but you have to take into consideration the teens who are 13-18 who know VERY well about sex an puppy love (its mandatory that they know in most states) and who just like to ask questions and answer them. Maybe we should make people ages 35 and older not allowed to be on yahoo answers because they want to know too much about MTV (and why it isnt music television anymore) or about the teen psyche or why their kid isn't responding to them in the way they want because they wont just talk to their kids. I mean, honestly.
I hate double standards.Is Yahoo Answers a good replacement for good parenting, and should it be limited to those 18 and older?
hmmm... i am 14 i like getting on here to just discuss things im uncomfotrable talking about with my mom and i could easily lie about my age if i felt like it
Parenting! Does that concept even exist anymore? If you judge by what's posted here, we are in the midst of a generation of complete morons! I guess that '; No Child Left Behind'; idea ain'ta doin' so goodly!
If you think about it, at least the kids are trying to learn about it. Schools these days don't teach them anything, and what kid is really gonna ask their parents. Maybe by reading the info on this site they will be more educated and make smarter decisions.
With a name one letter away from ';moredick,'; I'm surprised you can even pretend to meet the age requirement you suggested.
No comments:
Post a Comment